Affiliation:
1. Australian Centre for Precision Health, Unit of Clinical and Health Sciences University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia
2. South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Adelaide South Australia Australia
3. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy College of Health Sciences Addis Ababa Ethiopia
4. School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundCancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and better understanding of the risk factors could enhance prevention.MethodsWe conducted a hypothesis‐free analysis combining machine learning and statistical approaches to identify cancer risk factors from 2828 potential predictors captured at baseline. There were 459,169 UK Biobank participants free from cancer at baseline and 48,671 new cancer cases during the 10‐year follow‐up. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, material deprivation, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index and skin colour (as a proxy for sun sensitivity) were used for obtaining adjusted odds ratios, with continuous predictors presented using quintiles (Q).ResultsIn addition to smoking, older age and male sex, positively associating features included several anthropometric characteristics, whole body water mass, pulse, hypertension and biomarkers such as urinary microalbumin (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.16, 95% CI = 1.13–1.19), C‐reactive protein (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.20, 95% CI = 1.16–1.24) and red blood cell distribution width (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14–1.21), among others. High‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.81–0.87) and albumin (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.81–0.87) were inversely associated with cancer. In sex‐stratified analyses, higher testosterone increased the risk in females but not in males (Q5 vs. Q1 ORfemales 1.23, 95% CI = 1.17–1.30). Phosphate was associated with a lower risk in females but a higher risk in males (Q5 vs. Q1 ORfemales 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90–0.99 vs. ORmales 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.15).ConclusionsThis hypothesis‐free analysis suggests personal characteristics, metabolic biomarkers, physical measures and smoking as important predictors of cancer risk, with further studies needed to confirm causality and clinical relevance.
Subject
Clinical Biochemistry,Biochemistry,General Medicine
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献