Anchoring grassland sustainability with a nature‐based small burrowing mammal control strategy

Author:

Li Wenjin1ORCID,Knops Johannes M. H.2ORCID,Zhou Xi1ORCID,Jin Huijun34,Xiang Zhiqiang1ORCID,Ka Zhuo Cairang5,Jin Xiaoying34,Zhou Huakun6,Dong ShiKui7

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro‐Ecosystems College of Ecology Lanzhou University Lanzhou China

2. Health and Environmental Sciences Xi'an Jiaotong‐Liverpool University Suzhou China

3. School of Civil Engineering, Permafrost Institute Institute of Cold Regions Science and Engineering, and Northeast‐China Observatory and Research‐Station of Permafrost Geo‐Environment (Ministry of Education) Northeast Forestry University Harbin China

4. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soils Engineering Northwest Institute of Resources and Eco‐environment Chinese Academy of Sciences Lanzhou China

5. Grassland Station in Henan Mongolian Autonomous County Hen'an China

6. Key Laboratory of Restoration Ecology for Cold Regions in Qinghai Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology Chinese Academy of Sciences Xining China

7. School of Grassland Science Beijing Forestry University Beijing China

Abstract

Abstract Over the last 40 years, a burrowing mammal eradication policy has been prevalent on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP). This policy is based on similar burrowing mammal eradication programs in other areas and is justified on the assumptions that burrowing mammals compete with livestock for forage and contribute to grassland degradation. However, there is no clear theoretical or experimental evidence supporting these assumptions. This paper synthesizes the ecological functioning of small burrowing mammals in natural grasslands and discusses the irrationality and consequences of burrowing mammal eradication for sustainable livestock grazing and grassland degradation. Past burrowing mammal eradication efforts have failed because increased food availability for the remaining rodents and reduced predator populations led to rapid population rebounds. Herbivores differ in diet, and there is clear evidence that burrowing mammals, especially plateau zokors Myospalax baileyi, have a different diet than livestock. In QTP meadows, burrowing mammal eradication induces a shift towards plant communities with fewer species preferred by livestock and more species preferred by burrowing mammals. Thus, eradicating burrowing mammals has the opposite effect, a reduction in livestock preferred vegetation. We suggest that the policy of poisoning burrowing mammals needs to be reconsidered and revoked as soon as possible. We argue that incorporating density‐dependent factors such as predation and food availability are essential for maintaining a low burrowing mammal density. For degraded grasslands, we suggest that the optimal sustainable approach is to decrease the intensity of livestock grazing. Lower grazing induces changes in vegetation structure and plant species composition that increases predation on burrowing mammals and decreases the abundance of plants preferred by burrowing mammals. Such a nature‐based grassland management system maintains the density of burrowing mammals at a low stable density while minimizing human management and interventions.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3