Effects of Soil Type and Thermal Boundary on Predicting Temperature Profiles and Groundwater Fluxes

Abstract

AbstractIn the last few years, several articles have studied heat as a groundwater tracer and developed analytical geothermal solutions to predict the subsurface temperature and groundwater fluxes. These solutions can be sorted into steady‐state and transient solutions. The steady‐state solutions cannot describe the time‐varying subsurface temperature, while the transient solutions ignore subsurface thermal boundary effects. Moreover, soil type may be another crucial factor significantly affecting the prediction results. This study compares six existing classical analytical solutions to examine the effects of soil types and subsurface thermal boundaries on simulating temperature‐depth profiles and estimating groundwater fluxes. Several synthetic cases are built by considering the common soil types, sand and clay, to demonstrate their effects on predicting the profiles. A field case is used to show the effect of subsurface thermal boundaries on the groundwater flux estimated by an inverse approach. The study results indicate that the soil types have significant influences on simulating the profiles, and the influences grow with time. Some existing solutions may give inaccurate estimations of the field groundwater flux since they merely consider the heat source from the temperature variations on the ground surface but ignore possible thermal boundary effects in the subsurface. These findings will be valuable to those applying heat as a tracer to investigate infiltration.