Abstract
AbstractContrary to popular philosophical belief, judgment can indeed be an intentional action. That's because an intentional judgment, even one with content p, need not be intentional as a judgment that p. It can instead be intentional just as a judgment wh‐ for some specific wh‐ question—e.g. a judgment of which x is F or a judgment whether p. This paper explains how this is possible by laying out a means by which you can perform such an intentional action. This model of intentional judgment does not stand in tension with the fact that judgment is causally regulated for truth, and that it is correct only if it is true. On the contrary, the structure of intentional action explains how an intentional judgment has these features. An extended example is developed, and sufficient conditions on intentional judgment are laid out.
Reference44 articles.
1. Act and Intent
2. Why is belief involuntary?
3. ‘Making up your mind and the activity of reason;Boyle M.;Philosophers’ Imprint,2011
4. Two Faces of Intention