Reducing donor acceptance practice variation – Learnings from a discussion forum

Author:

Bansal Neha1ORCID,Jeewa Aamir2ORCID,Watanabe Kae3ORCID,Richmond Marc E.4,Alzubi Anaam5ORCID,D'Souza Nikita5,Bano Maria6,Lorts Angela5,Rosenthal David N.7ORCID,Taylor Katie8,O'Shea Catherine8,Smyth Lauren5,Koehl Devin9,Zhao Hong9,Hollander Seth A.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital New York New York USA

2. The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

4. Division of Pediatric Cardiology Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA

5. The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio USA

6. Department of Pediatric Cardiology UT Southwestern Dallas Texas USA

7. Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA

8. Narratize Inc. Cincinnati Ohio USA

9. Kirklin Solutions Hoover Alabama USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeAlthough waitlist mortality is unacceptably high, nearly half of donor heart offers are rejected by pediatric heart transplant centers. The Advanced Cardiac Therapy Improving Outcome Network (ACTION) and Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) convened a multi‐institutional donor decision discussion forum (DDDF) aimed at assessing donor acceptance practices and reducing practice variation.MethodsA 1‐h‐long virtual DDDF for providers across North America, the United Kingdom, and Brazil was held monthly. Each session typically included two case presentations posing a real‐world donor decision challenge. Attendees were polled before the presenting centerʼs decision was revealed. Group discussion followed, including a review of relevant literature and PHTS data. Metrics of participation, participant agreement with presenting center decisions, and impact on future decision‐making were collected and analyzed.ResultsOver 2 years, 41 cases were discussed. Approximately 50 clinicians attended each call. Risk factors influencing decision‐making included donor quality (10), size discrepancy (8), and COVID‐19 (8). Donor characteristics influenced 63% of decisions, recipient factors 35%. Participants agreed with the decision made by the presenting center only 49% of the time. Post‐presentation discussion resulted in 25% of participants changing their original decision. Survey conducted reported that 50% respondents changed their donor acceptance practices.ConclusionDDDF identified significant variation in pediatric donor decision‐making among centers. DDDF may be an effective format to reduce practice variation, provide education to decision‐makers, and ultimately increase donor utilization.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Transplantation,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3