Long‐term clinical impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) within the 90‐day blanking period on long‐term outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is controversial. This study aimed to assess the relationship between ERAT and late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (LRAT) post‐CBA.MethodsUtilizing data from a multicenter registry in Korea (May 2018 to June 2022), we analyzed the presence and timing of ERAT (<30, 30–60, and 60–90 days) and its association with LRAT risk after CBA. LRAT was defined as any recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 s beyond the 90 days.ResultsOut of 2636 patients, 745 (28.2%) experienced ERAT post‐CBA. Over an average follow‐up period of 21.2 ± 10.3 months, LRAT was observed in 874 (33.1%) patients. Patients with ERAT had significantly lower 1‐year LRAT freedom compared to those without ERAT (42.6% vs. 85.5%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified ERAT as a potential predictor of LRAT, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.47–4.57). Significant associations were noted across all examined time frames (HR, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.32–4.45 in <30 days, HR, 5.53; 95% CI, 4.13–7.42 in 30–60 days, and HR, 4.29; 95% CI, 3.12–5.89 in 60–90 days). This finding was consistently observed across all types of AF.ConclusionERAT during the 90‐day blanking period strongly predicts LRAT in AF patients undergoing CBA, indicating a need to reconsider the clinical significance of this period.