Real‐life users of hormonal or thermal male contraception: An analysis of female partners’ motivation, experience, and satisfaction

Author:

Laurent Clothilde1,Mieusset Roger23,Soufir Jean‐Claude4,Perrin Jeanne56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Marseille Aix‐Marseille Univ Marseille France

2. Développement Embryonnaire, Fertilité et Environnement (DEFE) INSERM Montpellier‐Toulouse, Toulouse France

3. Department of Andrology‐Reproductive Medicine Paule de Viguier Hospital CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse France

4. AVI Andrology, Arthur Vernes Institute Paris France

5. Laboratory of Reproductive Biology‐CECOS, Clinical‐Biological Centre of Assisted Reproductive Medicine, Hopitaux Universitaires de Marseille La Conception University Hospital Marseille France

6. Aix Marseille Univ Avignon University, CNRS, IRD, IMBE Marseille France

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTwo male contraceptive methods that inhibit spermatogenesis currently exist: thermal male contraception and hormonal male contraception. Only five studies have been conducted on the acceptability of these methods among men; among women, only the hypothetical acceptability of such a male contraceptive approach as the sole contraception method used by a couple has been evaluated.ObjectivesTo evaluate the motivation, experience, and satisfaction of female partners in couples using hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception as the sole contraception.Materials and methodsIn this cross‐sectional study, 123 male users of hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception as the couple's sole contraception method were asked to invite their female partner to participate in an anonymous online survey. The questionnaire included 95 questions exploring population characteristics, contraceptive and pregnancy history, motivations for choosing hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception, the experience of the women in the successive phase of use, relationships with their partner, and satisfaction with the contraception method.ResultsThe response rate among participating women was 69% (59/86). The two main reasons for choosing male contraceptive were the desire to share the contraception role in the couple (65%) and the desire of the man to take charge of the contraception (61%). The sexual satisfaction score increased significantly between the contraceptive methods used before hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception and the phase of contraceptive use (p < 0.01). The overall satisfaction level with thermal male contraception or hormonal male contraception was rated at 3.7 ± 0.6 out of 4. Women mostly recommended hormonal male contraception or thermal male contraception because of the share of contraceptive responsibility and mental load (n = 23/54, 43%).DiscussionThis population of women seemed to have struggled to find a contraceptive method that suited them, but most took advantage of thermal male contraception or hormonal male contraception and trusted their male partner to take charge of contraception use.ConclusionThe positive evaluation from women in partnerships using thermal male contraception and hormonal male contraception should encourage the development of these methods.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3