Neuropsychological evaluation of phenoconversion risk in REM sleep behaviour disorder: A scoping review

Author:

Fiamingo Giuseppe1ORCID,Capittini Cristina2,De Silvestri Annalisa2,Rebuffi Chiara3,Cerami Chiara45,Arnaldi Dario67,Terzaghi Michele18

Affiliation:

1. Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy

2. Clinical Epidemiology and Biometric Unit, Scientific Direction, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation Pavia Italy

3. IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini Genoa Italy

4. Scuola Universitaria di Studi Superiori IUSS Pavia Italy

5. Cognitive Computational Neuroscience Research Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy

6. Clinical Neurology, DINOGMI University of Genoa Genoa Italy

7. IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa Italy

8. Unit of Sleep Medicine and Epilepsy, IRCSS Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy

Abstract

SummaryThe objective of this study was to assess the role of cognitive evaluation in the prediction of phenoconversion in polysomnography‐confirmed idiopathic or isolated rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, through a scoping review focussing on a longitudinal comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of patients with idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder. A literature search (2006–2022) yielded 1034 records, and 20 were selected for analysis. The sample included 899 patients from eight different cohorts and five countries. We extracted data on clinical evolution, mild cognitive impairment diagnosis, neuropsychological tests used, and classification of cognitive domains. Tests, cognitive domains, and mild cognitive impairment definitions were heterogeneous across the studies, precluding a meta‐analysis. Ten studies (50%) evaluated the presence of mild cognitive impairment; 14 studies (70%) grouped neuropsychological tests into between three (6 studies, 21.4%) and seven (1 study, 7.1%) cognitive domains. The most frequently used tests were semantic fluency, Stroop colour word test, trail making test A and B, digit span, Rey auditory verbal learning test, and Rey‐Osterrieth figure. All except digit span showed a role in predicting phenoconversion. The authors did not consistently assign tests to specific cognitive domains. In conclusion, we discuss methodological differences between the studies and highlight the need for a standardised framework for neuropsychological data acquisition and presentation, based on a multilevel approach covering test selection, domain assignment, and mild cognitive impairment diagnostic criteria.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3