Process evaluation of the CO‐WORK‐CARE model: Collaboration and a person‐centred dialogue meeting for patients with common mental disorder in primary health care

Author:

Petersson Eva‐Lisa12ORCID,Törnbom Karin3ORCID,Björkelund Cecilia12ORCID,Jerlock Margaretha1,Hange Dominique12ORCID,Udo Camilla4ORCID,Svenningsson Irene12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Primary Health Care/School of Public Health and Community Medicine/Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

2. Research and Development Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland Gothenburg Sweden

3. Department of Social Work University of Gothenburg Goteborg Sweden

4. School of Health and Welfare Dalarna University Falun Sweden

Abstract

AbstractRationaleTo ensure optimal patient care based on evidence, it is crucial to understand how to implement new methods in practice. However, intervention studies often overlook parts of the implementation process. A comprehensive process evaluation is necessary to understand why interventions succeed or fail in specific contexts and to integrate new knowledge into daily practice. This evaluation examines the full implementation of the Co‐Work‐Care model in Swedish primary healthcare to identify strengths and weaknesses.AimThis study aimed to evaluate the process of implementing the CO‐WORK‐CARE model that focuses on close collaboration and the use of a person‐centred dialogue meeting in primary healthcare for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders.MethodThe CO‐WORK‐CARE model emphasises collaboration among the GP, rehabilitation coordinator and care manager, along with person‐centred dialogue meetings involving employers. Following UK Medical Research Council guidelines, we conducted a process evaluation. Data from previous studies were reanalysed. We also analysed field notes and meeting notes using Malterud's qualitative method.ResultsThe evaluation identified key facilitators for model implementation, including regular visits by facilitators and guidance from the research physician. Peer support meetings also bolstered implementation. However, challenges emerged due to conflicts with existing structures and limitations in person‐centred dialogue meetings.ConclusionAdapting the CO‐WORK‐CARE model to Swedish primary care is feasible and beneficial, with collaboration among the care manager, rehabilitation coordinator and GP and person‐centred dialogue meetings. Thorough preparations, ongoing facilitator and peer support and integrated information enhanced implementation efficiency, despite challenges posed by existing structures.

Funder

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd

Publisher

Wiley

Reference29 articles.

1. WHO.Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders Global Health Estimates Accessed March 13 2024 WHO‐MSD‐MER‐2017.2‐eng.pdf.

2. Adjustment Disorder: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment

3. Prevalence, Severity, and Comorbidity of 12-Month DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

4. Global patterns of workplace productivity for people with depression: absenteeism and presenteeism costs across eight diverse countries

5. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people;Nieuwenhuijsen K;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3