Patterns and cost of care according to keratinocyte cancer risk stratification in a volunteer population screening clinic: Real‐world data from the TRoPICS study

Author:

Lee Ruby Chia‐Lin1ORCID,Liyanage Upekha12,Fry Kirsty1,Brown Susan1,von Schuckmann Lena3,Spelman Lynda3,Soyer H. Peter4ORCID,Neale Rachel E.2,Gordon Louisa G.2,Whiteman David C.2,Olsen Catherine M.2ORCID,Janda Monika5,Khosrotehrani Kiarash1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. Queensland Institute of Dermatology Queensland Skin and Cancer Foundation Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. Dermatology Research Centre Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

5. Centre of Health Services Research The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRisk prediction tools have been developed for keratinocyte cancers (KCs) to effectively categorize individuals with different levels of skin cancer burden. Few have been clinically validated nor routinely used in clinical settings.ObjectivesTo assess whether risk prediction tool categories associate with interventions including chemoprophylaxis for skin cancer, and health‐care costs in a dermatologist‐run screening clinic.MethodsAdult participants who presented to a walk‐in screening facility were invited to participate. A self‐completed KC risk prediction tool was used to classify participants into one of the five risk categories. Participants subsequently underwent full skin examination by a dermatologist. Dermatological interventions and skin cancer‐related medical prescriptions were documented. Total health‐care costs, both to the health‐care system and patients were evaluated.ResultsOf the 507 participants recruited, 5‐fluorouracil cream and nicotinamide were more frequently prescribed in the higher risk groups as chemoprophylaxis (p < 0.005). A significant association with high predicted risk was also observed in the use of cryotherapy and curettage and cautery (p < 0.05). The average health‐care costs associated with a skin check visit increased from $90 ± 37 (standard deviation) in the lowest risk group to $149 ± 97 in the highest risk group (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsWe observed a positive association between higher predicted risk of skin cancer and the prescription of chemoprophylaxis and health‐care costs involved with opportunistic community skin cancer screening. A clinical use of risk stratification may be to provide an opportunity for clinicians to discuss skin cancer prevention and chemoprophylaxis with individual patients.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology

Reference32 articles.

1. The incidence and multiplicity rates of keratinocyte cancers in Australia

2. Non‐melanoma skin cancer in Australia

3. Multiplicity of skin cancers in Queensland and their cost burden to government and patients

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.Disease Expenditure in Australia 2018–19 [Internet].2021[cited 2023 Apr 21]. Available from:https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/health‐welfare‐expenditure/spending‐on‐disease‐in‐australia/contents/australian‐burden‐of‐disease‐conditions

5. A Model to Predict the Risk of Keratinocyte Carcinomas

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3