Contact sensitization to benzisothiazolinone: IVDK‐data of the years 2002 to 2021

Author:

Geier Johannes12ORCID,Brans Richard345ORCID,Weisshaar Elke6ORCID,Wagner Nicola7ORCID,Szliska Christiane8,Heratizadeh Annice9ORCID,Schubert Steffen12ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) Institute at the University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany

2. Lower Saxony Institute of Occupational Dermatology University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany

3. Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) University of Osnabrück Osnabrück Germany

4. Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory University of Osnabrück Osnabrück Germany

5. Lower Saxony Institute of Occupational Dermatology University of Osnabrück Osnabrück Germany

6. Unit for Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology Ruprecht‐Karls University Heidelberg Germany

7. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Friedrich‐Alexander University of Erlangen‐Nürnberg (FAU) Erlangen Germany

8. Department of Dermatology Bethesda Hospital Freudenberg Germany

9. Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBenzisothiazolinone (BIT; CAS no. 2634‐33‐5) is used as a biocide in various products, including water‐based paints, metalworking fluids, and household products. In recent years, increasing sensitization rates have been observed in Europe.ObjectiveTo describe a time trend of sensitization to BIT, analyse concomitant reactions, and identify patients with increased risk of BIT sensitization.MethodsRetrospective analysis of data from 26 739 patients patch tested with BIT, sodium salt, 0.1% petrolatum as part of several special test series within the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 2002 to 2021.ResultsPositive reactions to BIT were noted in 771 patients (2.9%). Sensitization frequency varied over time and increased in recent years, peaking at 6.5% in 2020. Painters and metalworkers handling metalworking fluids, but not cleaners, had a significantly increased risk of BIT sensitization. From our data, there is no evidence of immunological cross‐reactivity between BIT and other isothiazolinones.ConclusionThe increasing frequency of sensitization justifies adding BIT to the baseline series. More research on the clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to BIT and the cause for the rising numbers of BIT sensitization is needed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Immunology and Allergy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3