Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology DePaul University Chicago Illinois USA
2. Department of Psychology Seattle University Seattle Washington USA
Abstract
AbstractSocial and political psychologists have focused on how liberals and conservatives differ from one another and have developed a vast literature on individual differences and fixed attributes that distinguish ideological groups. However, ideological orientations might be more contextual and flexible than what is often portrayed in research. We present a novel look at ideological variability as an intragroup phenomenon that makes liberals and conservatives nuanced, heterogeneous, and more similar to one another—important perspectives for reducing ideological stereotyping and polarization. In this paper, we review patterns showing ideological variability and overlap in thinking, emotions, attitudes, and behaviors across the lifespan, geographical regions, status groups, and diverse cultures around the world. By understanding the social psychological and situational factors associated with intragroup variability in ideology, we can develop more culturally inclusive models of ideology and map out better solutions to polarization.
Reference149 articles.
1. Are Blacks and Latinos Responsible for the Passage of Proposition 8? Analyzing Voter Attitudes on California’s Proposal to Ban Same-Sex Marriage in 2008
2. Aging, Cohorts, and the Stability of Sociopolitical Orientations Over the Life Span
3. Anderson C. &Hildreth J. A. D.(2016).Striving for superiority: The human desire for status. Retrieved fromhttp://irle.berkeley.edu/striving‐for‐superiority‐the‐human‐desire‐for‐status/
4. The new realities of aging: Social and economic contexts;Angel J. L.;New Directions in the Sociology of Aging,2013