What factors predict anti‐Black bias in pain perception? An internal meta‐analysis across 40 experimental studies

Author:

Lin Jingrun1,Drain Alexis2,Goharzad Azaadeh2,Mende‐Siedlecki Peter2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA

2. Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA

Abstract

AbstractRacial disparities in pain care affecting Black Americans are mirrored by a similar perceptual bias: perceivers see pain less readily on Black (vs. White) faces. Here, we examine the findings of the initial wave of research on this phenomenon, described herein as anti‐Black bias in pain perception. Specifically, we conducted an internal meta‐analysis across 40 studies conducted in the U.S. with primarily White samples (N = 6252) assessing the generalizability, robustness, and psychological correlates of anti‐Black bias in pain perception. We also assessed the evidence for accounts of this bias focused on intergroup processes, racialized stereotypes and prejudice, dehumanization, and contact. This meta‐analysis strongly confirms our prior findings. Moreover, anti‐Black bias in pain perception is consistently associated with bias in treatment recommendations. These effects are robust to differences in stimuli, samples, and perceiver gender and race. Notably, both Black and White perceivers demonstrate more conservative perceptual thresholds for seeing pain on Black faces, suggesting this bias is not merely a consequence of group membership. Further, increased dehumanization of and decreased intergroup contact with Black individuals predicts biased pain perception and treatment recommendations, though these effects were small. These results demonstrate the robustness of anti‐Black bias in pain perception and establish a strong foundation for future inquiry.

Funder

National Institute of General Medical Sciences

Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Psychology

Reference145 articles.

1. American Hospital Association. (2019).National health care governance survey report(pp.1–86). Retrieved fromhttps://trustees.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2019/06/aha‐2019‐governance‐survey‐report_v8‐final.pdf

2. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pain: Causes and Consequences of Unequal Care

3. Clinician–Patient Racial/Ethnic Concordance Influences Racial/Ethnic Minority Pain: Evidence from Simulated Clinical Interactions

4. Black Americans' Implicit Racial Associations And Their Implications for Intergroup Judgment

5. OpenFace 2.0: Facial Behavior Analysis Toolkit

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3