Qualitative research at the crossroads of open science and big data: Ethical considerations

Author:

Stegenga Sondra M.1ORCID,Steltenpohl Crystal N.2ORCID,Lustick Hilary3,Meyer Melanie S.4ORCID,Renbarger Rachel5,Standiford Reyes Laurel6,Lee Lindsay Ellis7

Affiliation:

1. University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

2. Center for Open Science Charlottesville Virginia USA

3. University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell Massachusetts USA

4. Baylor University Waco Texas USA

5. FHI 360 Washington District of Columbia USA

6. University of Southern Indiana Evansville Indiana USA

7. East Tennessee State University Johnson City Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractOpen science practices are quickly being scaled up with publishers, grant‐makers, and Institutional Review Boards implementing new open policies, including requirements for increased data sharing across all types of research. Prior open science guidelines have focused mostly on issues relevant to quantitative, lab‐based, experimental research. Qualitative and other research traditions must be considered in the further development and implementation of these guidelines to ensure ethical practices in a new era where data is plentiful and being leveraged for research and other means. This article includes a discussion of why we must consider new research ethics in this era of big data and what steps can be taken to improve research practices through a systems change framework, The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Psychology

Reference119 articles.

1. The Belmont Report at 40: Reckoning With Time

2. Responsible practices for data sharing.

3. American Educational Research Association. (2011).Code of ethics. Retrieved fromhttps://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/About_AERA/CodeOfEthics(1).pdf.

4. American Psychological Association. (2017).Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved fromhttps://www.apa.org/ethics/code.

5. American Psychological Association. (2022).Equity diversity and inclusion framework. Retrieved fromhttps://www.apa.org/about/apa/equity‐diversity‐inclusion/framework.pdf.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3