Higher penalties, broader definitions, and national standards: Did harmonized Australian workplace health and safety laws reduce workers' compensation receipt?

Author:

Bilgrami Anam1ORCID,Cutler Henry1,Sinha Kompal2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie Business School Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Department of Economics, Macquarie Business School Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractA quasi‐experiment was created in Australian policy between 2012 and 2013 when workplace health and safety laws were harmonized in all but two jurisdictions. This reform expanded definitions for duty of care, introduced criminal enforcement, and increased penalties. Using stacked difference‐in‐difference estimation, we fail to find overall reduced workers' compensation probability over the post‐reform period. However, we find significantly reduced workers' compensation probabilities for high‐risk industry workers and workers in single‐location employers. We conclude that more consistent laws may not reduce overall claims and injury if they do not reduce complexity or consider available inspectorate resources, and if jurisdictions have implementation flexibility.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Industrial relations

Reference83 articles.

1. When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?

2. Systematic literature review on the effects of occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions at the workplace

3. The impact of prevention measures and organisational factors on occupational injuries

4. Askenazy P.2006.“Some Determinants of Reporting Workplace Accidents in France: The Role of Labour Contract”. Centre Pour La Recherche Economique Et Ses Applications (CEPREMAP) Paper 606.

5. Australian Bureau of Statistics.2020.“6291.0.55.003 ‐ Labour Force Australia Detailed Quarterly May 2020”.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3