Improving cefazolin exposure in critically ill children using a population pharmacokinetic model

Author:

Rivaud Clémence1,Oualha Mehdi12ORCID,Salvador Elodie3,Bille Emmanuelle45,Callot Delphine6,Béranger Agathe12,Bournaud Leo Froelicher27,Rouillon Steeve27,Toubiana Julie8,Benaboud Sihem27,Renolleau Sylvain1,Treluyer Jean Marc27ORCID,Hirt Déborah27,de Cacqueray Noémie12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Necker‐Enfants Malades Hospitals Paris Ile‐de‐France France

2. Pharmacology and Evaluations Therapeutics for Children and Pregnant Women Paris Ile‐de‐France France

3. Pediatric Medical Transport Unit and Intensive Care Unit Necker‐Enfants Malades Hospitals Paris Ile‐de‐France France

4. Department of Clinical Microbiology Necker‐Enfants Malades Hospitals Paris Ile‐de‐France France

5. INSERM U1151 CNRS UMR8253 Paris Ile‐de‐France France

6. Regional Pharmacovigilance Center Cochin Hospital Paris Ile‐de‐France France

7. Department of Clinical Pharmacology Cochin Hospital Paris Ile‐de‐France France

8. Department of General Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Necker‐Enfants Malades Hospitals Paris Ile‐de‐France France

Abstract

AimsPopulation pharmacokinetics (PK) models may be effective in improving antibiotic exposure with individualized dosing. The aim of the study is to assess cefazolin exposure using a population PK model in critically ill children.MethodsWe conducted a single‐centre observational study including children under 18 years old who had cefazolin plasma monitoring before and after a cefazolin model implementation. The first concentration at steady state of each cefazolin course was analysed. The optimal exposure was defined by concentration values ranging from free concentration over four times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 100% of the dosing interval to total trough or plateau concentration under 100 mg. L−1.ResultsA total of 58 patients were included, of whom 39 and 19 children received conventional dosing or model‐informed dosing, respectively. Median [range] age was 2.3 [0.1–17] years old, and median weight was 14.2 [2.9–72] kg. There were more continuous infusions (CI) in the model group than in the conventional group (n = 19/19 [100%] vs. n = 23/39 [59%]). Compared to conventional dosing, model‐informed dosing provided more optimal exposure (n = 17/39 [44%] vs. n = 15/19 [79%], P = .01) and less underexposure (n = 18/39 [46%] vs. n = 2/19 [10%], P = .008), without increasing overexposure (n = 4/39 [10%] vs. n = 2/19 [11%], P = 1). Moreover, the time to C‐reactive protein decrease by 50% was significantly shorter in the model group than the conventional group (3 [0.5–13] vs. 4 [1–34]; P = .045).ConclusionsUse of individualized cefazolin model‐informed dosing improves critically ill children's exposure. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical benefit of cefazolin PK model application.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3