Comparing approaches to determining poor oral health among older adults in a national survey

Author:

Horncastle Alice J.1,Gauld Taylor D.1,Smith Moira B.2,Thomson W. Murray1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand

2. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine University of Otago Wellington New Zealand

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare the clinical validity of the three approaches in residential care facility residents.BackgroundIn NZ residential care facilities, the interRAI assessment tool is used by trained registered nurses for assessing oral status when new residents are admitted, but its validity has been questioned. Although Locker's global oral health item has been used to measure oral health in surveys and health services research, it is not routinely used in care facilities, yet its clinical validity has been demonstrated in population‐based samples. Self‐perceived oral health need may also be useful.Materials and methodsUsing a secondary analysis of clinical and self‐reported data from a national survey of nursing home residents (the 2012 New Zealand Older People's Oral Health Survey, or OPOHS), we compared the validity of Locker's item, the interRAI tool and self‐reported treatment need for identifying three key clinical indicators of poor oral health among dentate older adults; those were coronal caries (3+ teeth affected), root caries (1+ teeth affected) and xerostomia. Analyses were conducted using STATA, and survey weighting was used to obtain estimates for a source population of 25‐843 individuals.ResultsThe prevalence of 3+ teeth with coronal caries was 28.7% (23.9, 34.0), the prevalence of 1+ teeth with root caries was 33.7% (28.7, 39.0), the prevalence of xerostomia was 23.1% (18.4, 28.3). Marked gradients in prevalence risk ratio were seen across different categories of Locker's global oral health item and the interRAI assessment tooth for coronal caries and xerostomia. Locker's global oral health item gave a better fitting model and was more discriminative in detecting coronal caries than the interRAI assessment tool (Lockers AIC = 0.76, interRAI AIC = 0.81). None of the approaches was particularly discriminative for root surface caries experience.ConclusionSelf‐reported approaches are discriminative for poor oral health. Standardised assessment tools used in residential care facilities should consider including a self‐assessment component such as Locker's global oral health item.

Funder

Ministry of Health, New Zealand

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,General Dentistry

Reference18 articles.

1. “Ageing in place”: the views of older homeowners on maintenance, renovation and adaptation;Davey J;Soc Policy J N Z,2006

2. Oral Health Among Older Adults With Complex Needs Living in the Community and in Aged Residential Care Facilities within New Zealand

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3