Cognitive domains affected post‐COVID‐19; a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Fanshawe Jack B.12ORCID,Sargent Brendan F.13,Badenoch James B.45,Saini Aman6,Watson Cameron J.78,Pokrovskaya Aleksandra9,Aniwattanapong Daruj710,Conti Isabella7,Nye Charles11,Burchill Ella12,Hussain Zain U.1314,Said Khanafi15,Kuhoga Elinda15,Tharmaratnam Kukatharmini3,Pendered Sophie3,Mbwele Bernard15,Taquet Maxime12,Wood Greta K.3,Rogers Jonathan P.12ORCID,Hampshire Adam9,Carson Alan16,David Anthony S.12,Michael Benedict D.31718,Nicholson Timothy R.7,Paddick Stella‐Maria1920,Leek Charles E.21

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry University of Oxford Oxford UK

2. Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK

3. Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

4. Barts Health NHS Trust London UK

5. Preventive Neurology Unit Queen Mary University of London London UK

6. School of Life and Medical Sciences University College London London UK

7. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK

8. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust London UK

9. Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London UK

10. Department of Psychiatry King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Bangkok Thailand

11. Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Gloucester UK

12. Division of Psychiatry University College London London UK

13. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Glasgow UK

14. Edinburgh Medical School University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

15. Mbeya College of Health and Allied Sciences University of Dar es Salaam Mbeya Tanzania

16. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

17. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

18. Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool UK

19. Translational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

20. Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust Gateshead UK

21. Department of Psychology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Abstract

AbstractBackground and purposeThis review aims to characterize the pattern of post‐COVID‐19 cognitive impairment, allowing better prediction of impact on daily function to inform clinical management and rehabilitation.MethodsA systematic review and meta‐analysis of neurocognitive sequelae following COVID‐19 was conducted, following PRISMA‐S guidelines. Studies were included if they reported domain‐specific cognitive assessment in patients with COVID‐19 at >4 weeks post‐infection. Studies were deemed high‐quality if they had >40 participants, utilized healthy controls, had low attrition rates and mitigated for confounders.ResultsFive of the seven primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5) cognitive domains were assessed by enough high‐quality studies to facilitate meta‐analysis. Medium effect sizes indicating impairment in patients post‐COVID‐19 versus controls were seen across executive function (standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.45), learning and memory (SMD −0.55), complex attention (SMD −0.54) and language (SMD −0.54), with perceptual motor function appearing to be impacted to a greater degree (SMD −0.70). A narrative synthesis of the 56 low‐quality studies also suggested no obvious pattern of impairment.ConclusionsThis review found moderate impairments across multiple domains of cognition in patients post‐COVID‐19, with no specific pattern. The reported literature was significantly heterogeneous, with a wide variety of cognitive tasks, small sample sizes and disparate initial disease severities limiting interpretability. The finding of consistent impairment across a range of cognitive tasks suggests broad, as opposed to domain‐specific, brain dysfunction. Future studies should utilize a harmonized test battery to facilitate inter‐study comparisons, whilst also accounting for the interactions between COVID‐19, neurological sequelae and mental health, the interplay between which might explain cognitive impairment.

Funder

Medical Research Council

UK Research and Innovation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference108 articles.

1. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic

2. Neurology and neuropsychiatry of COVID‐19: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the early literature reveals frequent CNS manifestations and key emerging narratives;Rogers JP;J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2021

3. Persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

4. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3