Implementation Strategies for Quality Improvement in Palliative Care: A Scoping Review

Author:

Dai Yunyun12ORCID,Daveson Barbara A.3,Gan Luyu2,Ding Jinfeng4,Chen Yongyi5,Johnson Claire E.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia

2. School of Nursing Guilin Medical University Guilin Guangxi China

3. Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia

4. Xiangya School of Nursing Central South University Changsha Hunan China

5. Hunan Cancer Hospital The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University Changsha Hunan China

6. Palliative Aged Care Outcomes Program, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundQuality improvement (QI) programs based on person‐centred outcome measures (PCOMs) play an important role in promoting optimal palliative care. However, routine use of PCOMs has been slow and difficult to implement, including within QI programs.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify implementation strategies that support the implementation of PCOMs as routine practice in hospital‐based palliative care, as well as the implementation theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) guiding the design of these implementation strategies.MethodsA scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review framework. Four databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and PubMed) were systematically searched for literature published between 1 January 1990 and 8 March 2024.ResultsOne hundred and fifteen unique implementation strategies, identified from 11 included studies, were mapped onto the 73 Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) discrete implementation strategies, covering 52% of the ERIC strategies. The most commonly used categories were train and educate stakeholders, and support clinicians, followed by develop stakeholder interrelationships and use evaluation and iterative strategies. Three key themes emerged: what to do; how to do it; and who to do it with. Only four studies employed TMFs to guide the design of the implementation strategies in this review.ConclusionsTo promote the implementation of PCOM‐based QI programs, strategies should be developed based on identified/potential barriers and facilitators by using rigorous TMFs. The components of the implementation strategies must be reported transparently and consistently to enable replication and measurement in future research and practice.Patient and Public ContributionThis scoping review does not directly involve patients or the general public in its design or execution. However, it is part of an implementation study aimed at integrating the Palliative Care Outcome Collaboration (PCOC) model into routine clinical practice at a cancer hospital in China. Before the formal implementation, palliative care professionals from this hospital highlighted the need for a comprehensive analysis of existing evidence to support the effective adoption of the PCOC model in their specific clinical setting.

Funder

University of Wollongong

Publisher

Wiley

Reference47 articles.

1. WHO “Palliative Care ”last modified August 5 2020 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care.

2. Evidence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of palliative care: A literature review

3. The Effectiveness and Cost‐Effectiveness of Hospital‐Based Specialist Palliative Care for Adults With Advanced Illness and Their Caregivers;Bajwah S.;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2020

4. Person-Centered Care for Older Adults with Chronic Conditions and Functional Impairment: A Systematic Literature Review

5. News from the NIH: Person-centered outcomes measurement: NIH-supported measurement systems to evaluate self-assessed health, functional performance, and symptomatic toxicity

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3