The risk of delirium after sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care unit patients

Author:

van Gelder Thomas G.1ORCID,van Diem‐Zaal Irene J.23,Dijkstra‐Kersten Sandra M. A.24,de Mul Nikki24,Lalmohamed Arief15,Slooter Arjen J. C.2467

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands

2. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands

3. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Rotterdam the Netherlands

4. UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands

5. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands

6. Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands

7. Department of Neurology UZ Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium

Abstract

AbstractAimKnowledge of risk factors may provide strategies to reduce the high burden of delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We aimed to compare the risk of delirium after deep sedation with propofol versus midazolam in ICU patients.MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, ICU patients who were in an unarousable state for ≥24 h due to continuous sedation with propofol and/or midazolam were included. Patients admitted ≤24 h, those with an acute neurological disorder and those receiving palliative sedation were excluded. ICU patients were assessed daily for delirium during the 7 days following an unarousable state due to continuous sedation.ResultsAmong 950 included patients, 605 (64%) subjects were delirious during the 7 days after awaking. The proportion of subsequent delirium was higher after midazolam sedation (152/207 [73%] patients) and after both propofol and midazolam sedation (257/377 [68%] patients), compared to propofol sedation only (196/366 [54%] patients). Midazolam sedation (adjusted cause‐specific hazard ratio [adj. cause‐specific HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05‐1.66) and propofol and midazolam sedation (adj. cause‐specific HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06‐1.56) were associated with a higher risk of subsequent delirium compared to propofol sedation only.ConclusionThis study among sedated ICU patients suggests that, compared to propofol sedation, midazolam sedation is associated with a higher risk of subsequent delirium. This risk seems more apparent in patients with high cumulative midazolam intravenous doses. Our findings underpin the recommendations of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (rehabilitation/mobilization), and Sleep (disruption) guidelines to use propofol over benzodiazepines for sedation in ICU patients.

Funder

Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3