Screening of dermatology drugs for aberrant use‐patterns: An application of epidemiologic estimates and measures of inequality in drug use

Author:

Delvin Thomas12ORCID,Bygum Anette34,Lund Lars Christian1,Andersen Jacob Harbo1,Hallas Jesper1

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Institute of Public Health University of Southern Denmark Odense C Denmark

2. R&D Medical Sciences LEO Pharma Ballerup Denmark

3. Clinical Institute University of Southern Denmark Odense C Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Genetics Odense University Hospital Odense C Denmark

Abstract

AbstractAimsDermatology treatments require adherence for safe and effective use. Real‐world healthcare databases can reveal drug utilization patterns and uncover inappropriate or unexpected use. This study aimed to analyse dermatology drug utilization patterns using epidemiological and inequality measures, leveraging Danish nationwide registries. It also assessed the feasibility of this method for detecting aberrant drug use.MethodsWe formed a 2019 cohort of all patients treated for skin conditions through Danish healthcare registries. We calculated prevalence, incidence rates and treatment duration for dermatological drugs. Inequality in drug utilization was assessed using Lorenz curves, Gini coefficients and other measures.ResultsThe study encompassed 1 021 255 patients using 94 dermatology drugs. Most usage aligned with ‘expected clinical use’, but we detected inequality, with some drugs having high Gini coefficients and disproportionate consumption by the top percentile of users. Notable findings included potential inappropriate antibiotic use, excessive topical corticosteroid use and unexpected drug use duration.ConclusionsIn Denmark, dermatology drugs are used primarily as anticipated, with minimal unexpected patterns. Specific follow‐up is required to draw conclusions about inappropriate use. This approach demonstrates broad applicability for screening aberrant drug utilization.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3