Addressing the White problem critically: A latent profile analysis of racial attitudes

Author:

Parigoris Ryan1ORCID,Hochman Alissa2ORCID,Hayes‐Skelton Sarah1ORCID,Suyemoto Karen L.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Massachusetts Boston Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Deparment of Family Medicine Rowan‐Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine Stratford New Jersey USA

Abstract

AbstractAdvancing racial justice requires changes in White people's critical consciousness, including understanding the historical, material, and cultural conditions that have given rise to and maintain racism and White supremacy on individual, interpersonal, and systemic levels. To effect such changes, we need to better understand White people's current racial attitudes and their relation to anti‐racist action. Consistent with the QuantCrit framework, this study explored White Americans’ (N = 531; mean age = 34.4; 60.8% female) racial attitudes using Latent Profile Analysis with indicators selected from measures categorized within four themes: empathic connection in cross‐racial relationships, affective awareness of white privilege, blatant colorblind racial attitudes, and structural awareness. LPA resulted in four profiles based on patterns in participant responses to indicator items: Uncritical, Ambivalent, Incongruous, and Critical racial attitudes. Analyses of demographic differences between profile members indicated that participants with higher levels of critical racial consciousness were more likely to be women, trans, or non‐heterosexual, and have more friendships with People of Color. Members of profiles with higher levels of critical reflection also had significantly higher scores on racial justice action outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference78 articles.

1. Factor analysis and AIC

2. From Dialogue to Action: The Impact of Cross-Race Intergroup Dialogue on the Development of White College Students as Racial Allies

3. American Psychological Association APA Task Force on Race and Ethnicity Guidelines in Psychology. (2019).Race and Ethnicity Guidelines in Psychology: Promoting Responsiveness and Equity. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/about/policy/race-and-ethnicity-in-psychology.pdf

4. Using Mplus TECH11 and TECH14 to test the number of latent classes;Asparouhov T.;Mplus Web Notes,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3