Understanding variations in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across space and time: The importance of norm perceptions and political dynamics

Author:

Sweigart Michael M.1ORCID,Galván‐Hernández Danna2ORCID,Hässler Tabea3ORCID,Hegarty Peter4ORCID,Kite Mary E.5ORCID,Ofosu Eugene K.6,Ünsal Banu C.7ORCID,Eisner Léïla3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA

2. Department of Social Psychology University of Granada Granada Spain

3. Department of Psychology University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

4. School of Psychology and Counselling Open University Milton Keynes UK

5. Department of Counseling Psychology, Social Psychology, and Counseling Ball State University Muncie Indiana USA

6. Princeton School of Public and International Affairs Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USA

7. Institute of Psychology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary

Abstract

AbstractThe 21st century has seen dynamic social, legal, and political change regarding the rights and acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ+) people. This article argues that social norm perceptions—perceptions of other people's opinions in a given social context—and the political dynamics that shape those perceptions are important for understanding differences in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across sociopolitical environments and time periods. Instead of emphasizing “actual” normspeople's opinions on average in different groupswe focus on norm perceptions since people often conform to the attitudes and behaviors held and endorsed by others to achieve social belonging and accuracy in their judgments. We review evidence regarding structural (e.g., laws and institutional decisions), group (e.g., social identities), and individual (e.g., ideology) factors that influence perceptions of, and conformity to, norms of LGBTIQ+ inclusion or exclusion. Drawing on this review, we consider how political dynamicsthe ways that civic and political actors make salient, promote, and frame issues, values, and norms in contesting or maintaining the status quoinfluence interpretations of, and responses to, norm signals, thus shaping differences in LGBTIQ+ rights norms across contexts and time periods. In conclusion, we chart future areas for research, policy, and practice.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference103 articles.

1. American Civil Liberties Union. (2023)Over 120 bills restricting LGBTQ rights introduced nationside in 2023 so far[Press release].https://www.aclu.org/press‐releases/over‐120‐bills‐restricting‐lgbtq‐rights‐introduced‐nationwide‐2023‐so‐far

2. Cisgender men and trans prejudice: Relationships with sexual orientation and gender self-esteem.

3. Opinions and Social Pressure

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3