Affiliation:
1. Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA
2. Department of Social Psychology University of Granada Granada Spain
3. Department of Psychology University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
4. School of Psychology and Counselling Open University Milton Keynes UK
5. Department of Counseling Psychology, Social Psychology, and Counseling Ball State University Muncie Indiana USA
6. Princeton School of Public and International Affairs Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USA
7. Institute of Psychology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary
Abstract
AbstractThe 21st century has seen dynamic social, legal, and political change regarding the rights and acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ+) people. This article argues that social norm perceptions—perceptions of other people's opinions in a given social context—and the political dynamics that shape those perceptions are important for understanding differences in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across sociopolitical environments and time periods. Instead of emphasizing “actual” norms—people's opinions on average in different groups—we focus on norm perceptions since people often conform to the attitudes and behaviors held and endorsed by others to achieve social belonging and accuracy in their judgments. We review evidence regarding structural (e.g., laws and institutional decisions), group (e.g., social identities), and individual (e.g., ideology) factors that influence perceptions of, and conformity to, norms of LGBTIQ+ inclusion or exclusion. Drawing on this review, we consider how political dynamics—the ways that civic and political actors make salient, promote, and frame issues, values, and norms in contesting or maintaining the status quo—influence interpretations of, and responses to, norm signals, thus shaping differences in LGBTIQ+ rights norms across contexts and time periods. In conclusion, we chart future areas for research, policy, and practice.
Reference103 articles.
1. American Civil Liberties Union. (2023)Over 120 bills restricting LGBTQ rights introduced nationside in 2023 so far[Press release].https://www.aclu.org/press‐releases/over‐120‐bills‐restricting‐lgbtq‐rights‐introduced‐nationwide‐2023‐so‐far
2. Cisgender men and trans prejudice: Relationships with sexual orientation and gender self-esteem.
3. Opinions and Social Pressure