Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best–worst scaling task

Author:

Metcalfe Rebecca Kathleen1ORCID,Dobischok Sophia12,Bansback Nick13ORCID,MacDonald Scott4,Byres David5,Lajeunesse Julie6,Harrison Scott4,Koch Bryce7,Topping Blue8,Brock Terry9,Foreman Julie10,Schechter Martin13,Oviedo‐Joekes Eugenia13

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Health Care St. Paul's Hospital Vancouver Canada

2. Department of Education and Counselling Psychology McGill University Montreal Canada

3. School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada

4. Providence Health Care Providence Crosstown Clinic Vancouver Canada

5. Provincial Health Services Authority Vancouver Canada

6. Island Health Victoria BC Canada

7. Doctor Peter Center Vancouver BC Canada

8. Downtown Community Health Centre Vancouver Canada

9. Lookout Housing and Health Society Surrey Canada

10. Hope to Health Research and Innovation Centre Vancouver Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsClinical trials support injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for whom other pharmacological management approaches are not well‐suited. However, despite substantial research indicating that person‐centered care improves engagement, retention and health outcomes for individuals with OUD, structural requirements (e.g. drug policies) often dictate how iOAT must be delivered, regardless of client preferences. This study aimed to quantify clients' iOAT delivery preferences to improve client engagement and retention.DesignCross‐sectional preference elicitation survey.SettingMetro Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Participants124 current and former iOAT clients.MeasurementsParticipants completed a demographic questionnaire package and an interviewer‐led preference elicitation survey (case 2 best–worst scaling task). Latent class analysis was used to identify distinct preference groups and explore demographic differences between preference groups.FindingsMost participants (n = 100; 81%) were current iOAT clients. Latent class analysis identified two distinct groups of client preferences: (1) autonomous decision‐makers (n = 73; 59%) and (2) shared decision‐makers (n = 51; 41%). These groups had different preferences for how medication type and dosage were selected. Both groups prioritized access to take‐home medication (i.e. carries), the ability to set their own schedule, receiving iOAT in a space they like and having other services available at iOAT clinics. Compared with shared decision‐makers, fewer autonomous decision‐makers identified as a cis‐male/man and reported flexible preferences.ConclusionsInjectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) clients surveyed in Vancouver, Canada, appear to prefer greater autonomy than they currently have in choosing OAT medication type, dosage and treatment schedule.

Funder

Canada Foundation for Innovation

Canada Research Chairs

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3