‘It's all about ticks’: A secondary qualitative analysis of nurse perspectives about documentation audit

Author:

Michl Gabriella1,Paterson Catherine123ORCID,Bail Kasia12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health University of Canberra Bruce Australian Capital Territory Australia

2. Canberra Health Services & ACT Health SYNERGY Nursing & Midwifery Research Centre Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

3. Robert Gordon University Aberdeen UK

Abstract

AbstractAimTo understand how nurses talk about documentation audit in relation to their professional role.BackgroundNursing documentation in health services is often audited as an indicator of nursing care and patient outcomes. There are few studies exploring the nurses' perspectives on this common process.DesignSecondary qualitative thematic analysis.MethodsQualitative focus groups (n = 94 nurses) were conducted in nine diverse clinical areas of an Australian metropolitan health service for a service evaluation focussed on comprehensive care planning in 2020. Secondary qualitative analysis of the large data set using reflexive thematic analysis focussed specifically on the nurse experience of audit, as there was the significant emphasis by participants and was outside the scope of the primary study.ResultsNurses': (1) value quality improvement but need to feel involved in the cycle of change, (2) highlight that ‘failed audit’ does not equal failed care, (3) describe the tension between audited documentation being just bureaucratic and building constructive nursing workflows, (4) value building rapport (with nurses, patients) but this often contrasted with requirements (organizational, legal and audit) and additionally, (5) describe that the focus on completion of documentation for audit creates unintended and undesirable consequences.ConclusionDocumentation audit, while well‐intended and historically useful, has unintended negative consequences on patients, nurses and workflows.ImpactAccreditation systems rely on care being auditable, but when individual legal, organizational and professional standards are implemented via documentation forms and systems, the nursing burden is impacted at the point of care for patients, and risks both incomplete cares for patients and incomplete documentation.No Patient or Public ContributionPatients participated in the primary study on comprehensive care assessment by nurses but did not make any comments about documentation audit.

Funder

University of Canberra

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3