The LMA® ProtectorTM in anaesthetised, non-paralysed patients: a multicentre prospective observational study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The LMA® ProtectorTM in anaesthetised, non-paralysed patients: a multicentre prospective observational study

Published:2019-01-28 Issue:3 Volume:74 Page:333-339
ISSN:0003-2409
Container-title:Anaesthesia
language:en
Short-container-title:Anaesthesia

Author:

Zaballos M.¹²,Zaballos J.³,López S.⁴,Fernández-Dïez A. I.⁵,Lluch-Oltra A.⁶,Mexedo C.⁷,López A.⁸⁹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Toxicology; Complutense University; Madrid Spain

2. Department of Anaesthesiology; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain

3. Department of Anaesthesiology; Guipúzcoa Polyclinic; Grupo Quirón Salud; San Sebastián Spain

4. Department of Anaesthesiology; Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña; Spain

5. Department of Anaesthesiology; Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León; Spain

6. Department of Anaesthesiology; Hospital La Fe; Valencia Spain

7. Department of Anaesthesiology; Centro Hospitalar Universitario do Porto; Portugal

8. Anaesthesiology and Algology; KU Leuven; Leuven Belgium

9. Department of Anaesthesiology; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona; Spain

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/anae.14534/fullpdf

Reference19 articles.

1. A preliminary assessment of the LMA protector™ in non-paralysed patients;Sng;BMC Anesthesiology,2017

2. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage;Verghese;Anesthesia and Analgesia,1996

3. A fibreoptic scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices. Interobserver variability and a comparison between the standard, flexible and intubating laryngeal mask airways;Keller;Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherzpie,2000

4. If it hasn't failed, does it work? On ‘the worst we can expect’ from observational trial results, with reference to airway management devices;Pandit;Anaesthesia,2012

5. A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu AuraGain™ laryngeal mask versus the LMA® protector airway in paralyzed, anesthetized adult men;Moser;Minerva Anestesiologica,2018

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Effect of Different Insertion Methods on LMA Protector-Related Complications: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trail;Journal of Craniofacial Surgery;2024-09-12

2. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA ProSeal in anaesthetised paralysed patients – A randomised controlled trial;Indian Journal of Anaesthesia;2023-11

3. Comparison of gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of LMA ProtectorTM versus the conventional method in achieving oesophagal patency - A randomised comparative study;Indian Journal of Anaesthesia;2023-11

4. Comparative Evaluation of Placement of Auragain, ProSeal and Protector Laryngeal Mask Airways using Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomised Clinical Study;JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH;2023

5. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA-ProSeal in different head and neck positions in anaesthetized and paralyzed patients; A prospective randomized study;Indian Journal of Anaesthesia;2023