Exploring Australian Dietitians' knowledge, experience and perspectives of time‐restricted eating in private practice: A qualitative study

Author:

Pye Caitlin1,Parr Evelyn B.2ORCID,Flint Steve A.2,Devlin Brooke L.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Exercise and Nutrition Research Program, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research Australian Catholic University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

SummaryTime‐restricted eating is a novel nutrition intervention with evidence of beneficial effects on weight loss, blood glucose management, and other metabolic health outcomes. Adherence to time‐restricted eating is higher than some traditional nutrition interventions to support individuals living with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, there may be an evidence‐practice gap of time‐restricted eating in Australian dietetic practice. The present study aimed to explore dietitians' knowledge, experiences, and perspectives of time‐restricted eating and timing of eating advice in practice. Semi‐structured interviews with 10 private practice dietitians across Australia were conducted. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed thematically. Six themes were identified: (i) distinction of time‐restricted eating to other fasting protocols; (ii) knowledge of health benefits of time‐restricted eating; (iii) patient‐led advice frequently given: timing of breakfast and dinner; (iv) dietitian‐led advice frequently given: eating cut‐off time to avoid late night snacking; (v) barriers and facilitators to offering time‐restricted eating or timing of eating advice; (vi) timing of eating advice within professional guidelines and resources. These findings suggest the need for development of professional resources and educational development tools for dietitians on time‐restricted eating.

Funder

University of Queensland

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3