Minimal important difference in weight loss following bariatric surgery: Enhancing BODY‐Q interpretability

Author:

Dalaei Farima123ORCID,Dijkhorst Phillip J.4ORCID,Möller Sören35,de Vries Claire E. E.46ORCID,Poulsen Lotte12ORCID,Voineskos Sophocles H.7ORCID,Kaur Manraj N.6ORCID,Thomsen Jørn Bo12ORCID,van Veen Ruben N.8,Juhl Claus B.910ORCID,Andries Alin10,Støving René K.111213ORCID,Cano Stefan J.14ORCID,Klassen Anne F.15ORCID,Pusic Andrea L.6ORCID,Sørensen Jens A.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Unit of Plastic Surgery Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

2. Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

3. OPEN: Open Patient data Explorative Network Odense Denmark

4. Department of Surgery OLVG West Hospital & Dutch Obesity Clinic (NOK) Amsterdam The Netherlands

5. Odene University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

6. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard University Boston Massachusetts USA

7. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

8. Department of Surgery OLVG Amsterdam The Netherlands

9. Hospital of Southwest Jutland, Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark and Steno Diabetes Center Odense Denmark

10. Department of Endocrinology Hospital of Southwest Jutland Esbjerg Denmark

11. Center for Eating Disorders Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

12. Research Unit for Medical Endocrinology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

13. Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

14. Modus Outcomes Ltd Cheltenham UK

15. Department of Pediatrics McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

Abstract

SummaryBODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure for comprehensive assessment of outcomes specific to patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The clinical utility of BODY‐Q is hampered by the lack of guidance on score interpretation. This study aimed to determine minimal important difference (MID) for assessment of BODY‐Q. Prospective BODY‐Q data from Denmark and the Netherlands pre‐ and post‐bariatric surgery were collected. Two distribution‐based methods were used to estimate MID by 0.2 standard deviations of baseline scores and the mean standardized response change of scores from baseline to 3‐years postoperatively. In total, 5476 assessments from 2253 participants were included of which 1628 (72.3%) underwent Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass, 586 (26.0%) sleeve gastrectomy, 33 (1.5%) gastric banding, and 6 (0.03%) other surgeries. The mean age was 45.1 ± 10.9 with a mean BMI of 46.6 ± 9.6. Baseline MID ranged from 1 to 4 in health‐related quality of life (HRQL) and from 2 to 8 in appearance scales. The mean change of scores ranged from 4 to 5 in HRQL and from 4 to 7 in the appearance scales. The estimated MID for the change in BODY‐Q HRQL and appearance scales ranged from 3 to 8 and is recommended for use to interpret BODY‐Q scores and assess treatment effects in bariatric surgery.

Funder

Jascha Fonden

Region Syddanmark

Odense Universitetshospital

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3