Understanding nursing assessment of health literacy in a hospital context: A qualitative study

Author:

Hogan Alana1ORCID,Hughes Lynda1ORCID,Coyne Elisabeth12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

Abstract

AbstractProblemNurses are fundamental in presenting information to their patients to ensure understanding of information, and health directions enabling improved health outcomes. Limited research exists exploring how nurses assess patient's health literacy in Australia.AimTo explore Australian nurses' perceptions of patients' health literacy and how nurses assess health literacy to provide patient education.DesignA qualitative study underpinned by phenomenology.MethodsRegistered Nurses (N = 19) across five Queensland hospitals participated in semi‐structured interviews which explored nurses' assessment of patient's health literacy level and their practices of delivering education. The transcripts were analysed using an inductive process with interpretative analysis.ResultsFour themes were identified: how we assess patient health literacy; challenges with health literacy assessment; consumer focused assessment; and building assessment strategies. Participants relied on cues from the patient to identify when information has not been understood. Participants felt that online training programs in the workplace would assist in education for assessment techniques; identification of patients with low health literacy; and how to best communicate with patients that have low health literacy.ConclusionFormal health literacy assessments should be introduced to hospitals in Australia, but training is required to enable the nurse, the confidence and ability for health literacy assessment. Tailored education based on health literacy assessment would enhance the patient's understanding and improve discharge planning, which may reduce health service costs and readmissions.Reporting methodThe Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines for qualitative research were followed.Patient or public contributionRegistered Nurses (N = 19) participated in qualitative interviews, providing data for analysis.Relevance to clinical practiceThis study shows that nurses are already conducting informal assessments, simply by using observation and looking for cues. More education for nurses about health literacy and how to tailor their discussions with patients will improve communication.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Reference36 articles.

1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2019).Avoidable hospital readmissions.https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our‐work/indicators/avoidable‐hospital‐readmissions

2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2021).National safety and quality health service standards 2nd edn version 2.https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022).Health Literacy. Retrieved March 22 2023 fromhttps://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias‐health/health‐literacy

4. Towards a more patient-centered clinical trial process: A systematic review of interventions incorporating health literacy best practices

5. Teach‐back: A simple technique to enhance patients' understanding;Bodenheimer T.;Family Practice Management.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3