Improving patient’s intensive care admission through multidisciplinary simulation‐based crisis resource management: A qualitative study

Author:

Jensen Janet F.123ORCID,Ramos Joanna24,Ørom Marie‐Louise2,Naver Kirsten B.2,Shiv Louise2,Bunkenborg Gitte356ORCID,Kodal Anne Marie2,Skram Ulrik2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark

2. Department of Anesthesiology, North Zealand Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

4. Department of Thoracic Anaesthesiology Rigshospital Copenhagen Denmark

5. Department of Cardiology Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark

6. Department of Anesthesiology Holbaek Hospital Holbaek Denmark

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore nurses' and physicians' experiences of simulation‐based training in a crisis resource management quality improvement intervention on intensive care admission.BackgroundQuantitative studies have documented that staffs' non‐technical skills are improved after simulation‐based training in crisis resource management interventions. Experienced‐based consensus led to development of a quality improvement intervention based on principles of crisis resource management and tested in simulation‐based training to enhance staffs' non‐technical skills. However, the impact on staff is unexplored, leaving little understanding of the relationship between simulation‐based training in crisis resource management interventions and changes in non‐technical skills.DesignA qualitative study with a hermeneutical approach.MethodsData consisted of semi‐structured interviews with physicians (n = 5) and nurses (n = 15) with maximum variation in work experience. Data were collected 3 months after implementation and analysed using thematic analysis. The COREQ guideline was applied.ResultsThe analysis revealed three themes: prioritising core clinical activities and patient centredness; transition into practice; and reflection on patient safety. These themes reflected staff's experiences of the intervention and implementation process, which evolved through prioritising core clinical activities that facilitated the transition into clinical practice and staff's reflection on patient safety.ConclusionsPrioritising core clinical activities were facilitated by clear communication, predefined roles and better teamwork. Transition into practice stimulated professional growth through feedback. Reflection on patient safety created a new understanding on how a new structure of intensive care admission could be implemented. Collectively, this indicated a joint understanding of admissions.Implications for PracticeFindings enables health care professionals to understand how the intervention can contribute to improve quality of care in management of intensive care admission. Improving non‐technical skills are vital in high‐quality admissions, which supported a structured process and a collaborative professional standard of admissions.Patient and Public ContributionNone.

Funder

Nordsjællands Hospital

TrygFonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3