Decision‐making in nursing research and practice—Application of the Cognitive Continuum Theory: A meta‐aggregative systematic review

Author:

O'Connor Tricia12ORCID,Gibson Jo1ORCID,Lewis Joanne3ORCID,Strickland Karen145ORCID,Paterson Catherine1678ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health University of Canberra Bruce Canberra Australia

2. Clare Holland House North Canberra Hospital Bruce Canberra Australia

3. School of Nursing and Health Avondale University Wahroonga New South Wales Australia

4. School of Nursing and Midwifery Edith Cowan University Perth Western Australia Australia

5. School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences Auckland University of Technology Auckland New Zealand

6. Robert Gordon University Aberdeen UK

7. Caring Futures Institute Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia

8. Central Adelaide Health Network Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore how the Cognitive Continuum Theory has been used in qualitative nursing research and to what extent it has been integrated in the research process using the Qualitative Network for Theory Use and Methodology (QUANTUM).BackgroundTheory, research and nursing are intrinsically linked, as are decision‐making and nursing practice. With increasing pressure on nurses to improve patient outcomes, systematic knowledge regarding decision‐making is critical and urgent.DesignA meta‐aggregative systematic review.MethodsDatabasesCINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and PubMed were searched from inception until May 2022 for peer‐reviewed research published in English.Seven studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research. A meta‐aggregative synthesis was conducted using Joanna Briggs methodology. The QUANTUM typology was used to evaluate the visibility of the Cognitive Continuum Theory in the research process.ResultsThe review identified five synthesised findings, namely: 1. the decision‐making capacity of the individual nurse, 2. nurses’ level of experience, 3. availability of decision support tools, 4. the availability of resources and 5. access to senior staff and peers. Only two of seven studies rigorously applied the theory. The included studies were mainly descriptive‐exploratory in nature.ConclusionThe transferability of the Cognitive Continuum Theory was demonstrated; however, evolution or critique was absent. A gap in the provision of a patient‐centric approach to decision‐making was identified. Education, support and research is needed to assist decision‐making.A new Person‐Centred Nursing Model of the Cognitive Continuum Theory has been proposed to guide future research in clinical decision‐making.Relevance to Clinical PracticeNurses make numerous decisions every day that directly impact patient care, therefore development and testing of new theories, modification and revision of older theories to reflect advances in knowledge and technology in contemporary health care are essential.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3