Clinical decision‐making and the nursing process in digital health systems: An integrated systematic review

Author:

Hants Laura1ORCID,Bail Kasia12ORCID,Paterson Catherine12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health University of Canberra Bruce Australian Capital Territory Australia

2. Canberra Health Services and ACT Health, SYNERGY Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, ACT Health Directorate Level 3 Canberra Hospital Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo identify how the nursing process (assessment, planning, intervention and outcome evaluation) has been incorporated into digital health systems (electronic medical records, electronic care plans and clinical decision support systems) to gain an understanding of known benefits and challenges posed to nurses' decision‐making processes.BackgroundNursing terminologies, including the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP), and Nursing Minimum Data Set's (NMDS), have been developed to improve standardised language integration of components of nursing care into digital systems. However, there is limited evidence regarding whether the complete nursing process is effectively being incorporated into digital health systems.MethodsAn integrative systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was applied to extract articles from included databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science Core Collection. Articles were limited to English language and published January 2007–March 2022 and assessed using a pre‐determined eligibility criteria. Quality assessment and a narrative synthesis were conducted.ResultsA total of 3321 articles were identified, and 27 studies included. There were (n = 10) qualitative, (n = 4) quantitative non‐randomised controlled trials, (n = 3) quantitative descriptive studies and (n = 10) mixed methods. Nurse assessment and planning components were the most comprehensive phases incorporated into digital health systems, and interventions and outcome evaluation were scarcely reported.ConclusionsInadequate capture of nursing work is a problem unresolved by digital health systems. This omission may be hindering nurse clinical decision‐making for patient care and limiting the visibility of the nursing role in health care interventions and the associated impact on patient outcomes.Relevance to clinical practiceFurther research is needed on how digital systems can support nurses to apply the full nursing process and to further evaluate patient outcomes. Digital systems can support health‐service level evaluation through capturing missed nursing care and the consequences on patients utilising nurse‐sensitive‐outcomes; however, this is not yet being realised.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3