A point prevalence study of medical device‐associated pressure injuries: A cross‐sectional study

Author:

Yalçin Melek1,Güneş Ülkü2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ege University Hospital Chest Clinic Izmir Turkey

2. Department of Fundamental of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing Ege University Izmir Turkey

Abstract

AbstractAim and ObjectiveThe aim of this cross‐sectional study was to determine the point prevalence and associated risk factors of medical device‐related pressure injuries (MDRPI) in intensive care patients in Turkey.BackgroundMDRPI remain a clinical problem that has garnered the attention of healthcare professionals.DesignThis study used a cross‐sectional design and was conducted over a single day in all intensive care units.MethodData were collected through face‐to‐face interviews, observation, skin examination and detailed diagnosis of MDRPI development and influencing factors. Presence of pressure injuries on the skin in the areas where the patient's medical device was placed was defined. The study was reported according to the STROBE declaration.ResultsMDRPI developed in 65 out of 200 patients included in the study (32.5%). The most frequent locations were on the face (71%). The MDRPIs were commonly associated with nasogastric tube (29.2%), endotracheal tube (18.5%) and CPAP mask (15.4%). A significant proportion of these injuries were mucosal (53.8%, n = 35). The majority of the skin pressure injuries were classified as Stage II (18.5%, n = 12). The risk increased 14 times in patients who were hospitalised for 9–16 days and 13 times in those who received mechanical ventilator support.ConclusionThe study findings suggest that MDRPI developed in approximately one of three patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit, and the length of hospital stay and mechanical ventilator support were important determining risk factors. The high prevalence of MDRPI may indicate inadequate nursing care quality. Therefore, it is recommended that nurses be aware of risk factors and evaluate the suitability and safety of medical devices.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution was involved in this study.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Reference35 articles.

1. A cross‐sectional study on medical device‐related pressure injuries among critically ill patients in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia;Amirah M. F.;World Council of Enterostomal Therapists Journal,2017

2. Preventing Device-Related Pressure Ulcers

3. Features of Pressure Ulcers in Hospitalized Older Adults

4. The incidence and prevalence of medical device-related pressure ulcers in intensive care: a systematic review

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3