Instruments for assessing the spiritual needs of cancer patients: A systematic review of psychometric properties

Author:

Wang Wei1ORCID,Yang Jing1,Bai Dingxi1,He Jiali1,Cai Mingjin1ORCID,Gong Xiaoyan1,Lu Xianying1,Hou Chaoming1,Gao Jing1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Nursing Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu China

Abstract

AbstractAims and ObjectivesTo identify available instruments for assessing cancer patients' spiritual needs and to examine their psychometric properties using the Consensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology.BackgroundCancer patients frequently have significant spiritual needs. The nurse plays an integral role in assessing the patient's spiritual needs as part of providing holistic care. It is crucial to assess these needs using appropriate and reliable instruments.DesignA systematic review based on COSMIN methodology.MethodsSeven electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, CNKI and WANFANG) were systematically searched from inception until 14 February 2023. Two authors independently screened eligible literature, extracted data and evaluated methodological and psychometric quality. This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA checklist.ResultsSixteen studies have reported 16 different versions of the instruments. None of the instruments were properly assessed for all psychometric properties, nor were measurement error, responsiveness and cross‐cultural validity/measurement invariance reported. All of the instruments failed to meet the COSMIN quality criteria for content validity. The quality of evidence for structural validity and/or internal consistency in five instruments did not meet the COSMIN criteria. Eventually, five instruments were not recommended, and 11 were only weakly recommended.ConclusionInstruments to assess spiritual needs exhibited limited reliability and validity. The Spiritual Care Needs Scale is provisionally recommended for research and clinical settings, but its limitations regarding content validity and cross‐cultural application must be considered in practice. Future research should further revise the content of available instruments and comprehensively and correctly test their psychometric properties.Relevance to Clinical PracticeThe review findings will provide evidence for healthcare professionals to select instruments for recognising spiritual needs in cancer patients.No Patient or Public ContributionThis study is a systematic review with no patient or public participation.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3