Response to letter to the editor by Diong 2018 “Confidence intervals that cross zero must be interpreted correctly”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Response to letter to the editor by Diong 2018 “Confidence intervals that cross zero must be interpreted correctly”

Published:2019-02-08 Issue:3 Volume:29 Page:478-479
ISSN:0905-7188
Container-title:Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
language:en
Short-container-title:Scand J Med Sci Sports

Author:

Pamboris George M.¹^ORCID,Noorkoiv Marika¹²^ORCID,Baltzopoulos Vasilios³^ORCID,Mohagheghi Amir A.¹²⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Human Performance, Exercise and Rehabilitation; Brunel University London; Uxbridge UK

2. Institute of Environment, Health and Societies; Brunel University London; Uxbridge UK

3. Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences (RISES); Liverpool John Moores University; Liverpool UK

4. University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences; Tehran Iran

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/sms.13351/fullpdf

Reference7 articles.

1. Dynamic stretching is not detrimental to ankle plantarflexor muscles neuromechanical and sensorimotor performance;Pamboris;Scand J Med Sci Sports,2018

2. Error rates, decisive outcomes and publication bias with several inferential methods;Hopkins;Sport Med,2016

3. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes;Batterham;Int J Sports Physiol Perform,2006

4. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations;Greenland;Eur J Epidemiol,2016

5. Sifting the evidence-what’s wrong with significance tests?;Sterne;Phys Ther,2001

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Magnitude‐based Inference is not Bayesian and is not a valid method of inference;Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports;2019-08-04