Comparison between neonatal outcomes of labor and delivery with labor neuraxial analgesia and without analgesia: A propensity score‐matched study

Abstract

AbstractAimThis single‐center observational study aimed to investigate the association between labor neuraxial analgesia (LNA) and neonatal outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary perinatal center and included all vaginal deliveries performed between November 2015 and December 2021. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between deliveries with LNA (LNA group) and without analgesia (control group). Propensity score (PS) matching was used for statistical analysis.ResultsWe included 2343 singleton deliveries performed in 1367 nulliparous and 976 multiparous women, in whom LNA was induced in 352 and 178 deliveries, respectively. After PS matching, the nulliparous LNA group had a significantly higher incidence of Apgar scores <7 at 1 (7.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.0139) and 5 min (2.3% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.0397) and meconium staining (29.8% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.0272) than the nulliparous control group. Other neonatal outcomes, including umbilical artery pH and neonatal intensive care unit admission rate, were comparable between the nulliparous LNA and control groups. No significant differences in neonatal outcomes were seen in multiparous women. Regarding fetal heart rate abnormalities, severe late deceleration (4.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.0036) and severe prolonged deceleration (17.0% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.0224) were more common in the nulliparous LNA group than in the nulliparous control group, and the multiparous LNA group exhibited more severe variable deceleration (21.3% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.0485) than the multiparous control group.ConclusionOur findings suggest that LNA is associated with short‐term adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes in vaginal deliveries. LNA should be performed with precautionary measures and adequate medical resources.