Affiliation:
1. LSE, Houghton Street, London University of Cambridge Ringgold standard institution Cambridge Cambridgeshire United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Abstract
AbstractNational symbols play a significant role in contemporary politics by shaping national identities. However, national animals receive little attention in the scholarship. This paper analysed the national animal’s history, strengths, formation and implications as a political symbol. It argues that using the animal as a national symbol has distinctive strengths because animal symbols have concrete traits and an interactive dimension. However, the national animals are not granted the same political significance in the formal institutional setting as other symbols because of the concern about exacerbating disunity between nations and potential undesirable international responses. Nonetheless, when the separatist movements of Catalonia and Flanders utilise the national animal, it does not face the same challenges and therefore has received more popularity from the nationals.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference108 articles.
1. AFP/Stringer. (2013 October 25).Flemish nationalists protest during the "Joyous Entry" of the Belgian royal couple to present themselves to the public in Bruges. Getty Images.
2. Amies N.(2007 Febuary 10).Crisis in Belgium. Retrieved from Deutsche Wellehttps://www.dw.com/en/belgian-political-crisis-and-talk-of-linguistic-divisions-continue/a-2804788
3. Arias D.(2016 April 5).The Andean Condor. Retrieved from SOLEQ.travelhttps://soleq.travel/the-andean-condor/