Pain control and subconjunctival haemorrhage after intravitreal injection using cooled anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics: A prospective, double‐blind, randomized controlled trial

Author:

Moshkovsky Ran12ORCID,Golan Nili23,Aviel Gadot Einat4,Bar Asaf12,Achiron Asaf5ORCID,Fischer Naomi12ORCID,Spierer Oriel12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology Wolfson Medical Center Holon Israel

2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

3. Department of Ophthalmology Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel

4. The Faculty of Exact Sciences Bar Ilan University Ramat Gan Israel

5. Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo evaluate whether cooled anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics alleviate pain and minimise subconjunctival haemorrhage following intravitreal injection.MethodsA prospective, double‐masked, randomised controlled trial of 100 participants receiving either cooled (n = 50) or room temperature (n = 50) topical anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics before receiving an injection of bevacizumab. Baseline tolerability was estimated using a self‐reported pain sensitivity questionnaire.ResultsOverall tolerability was comparable between the study group and the control group (0.75 ± 0.13 vs. 0.74 ± 0.14, respectively, p = 0.99). Subconjunctival haemorrhage incidence was similar in both groups (80% vs. 86%, respectively, p = 0.113), as was subconjunctival haemorrhage size (2.75 ± 5.51 mm2 vs. 5.53 ± 10.72 mm2, respectively, p = 0.11). Sub‐group analysis demonstrated that the participants taking daily ocular eyedrops who received cooled anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics reported less pain at 10 min and less burning sensation at 24 h compared with matched controls (0.67 ± 1.50 vs. 2.50 ± 3.03, respectively, p = 0.040 and 0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 1.44 ± 2.96, respectively, p = 0.045). Participants who received cooled eyedrops and did not use antithrombotic therapy had smaller‐sized subconjunctival haemorrhages compared with matched controls (1.55 ± 1.87 mm2 vs. 8.29 ± 14.61 mm2, respectively, p = 0.038). Participants with hypertension who received cooled eyedrops had smaller‐sized subconjunctival haemorrhage compared with matched controls (2.33 ± 4.99 mm2 vs. 6.89 ± 12.41 mm2, respectively, p = 0.045).ConclusionThe benefit of using cooled anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics to alleviate pain and minimise subconjunctival haemorrhage following intravitreal injection was not proven in the general population. It may be beneficial in part for some patients, such as those who regularly use eyedrops, patients with hypertension or those not on antithrombotic therapy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Comparison of the tolerability of diclofenac and Nepafenac;Achiron A.;Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics,2016

2. The use of ice pack for pain associated with arterial punctures;Bastami M.;Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research,2015

3. Randomized trial of anesthetic methods for intravitreal injections;Blaha G.R.;Retina,2011

4. Cooling anesthesia for Intravitreal injections–a review;Chandrasekaran P.R.;Clinical Ophthalmology,2023

5. Effects of artificial tear temperature on corneal sensation and subjective comfort;Fujishima H.;Cornea,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3