Front‐line and second‐line treatment for mantle cell lymphoma in clinical practice: A multicenter retrospective analysis

Author:

Harmanen Minna1,Sorigue Marc2ORCID,Khan Madiha1,Prusila Roosa3,Klaavuniemi Tuula4,Kari Esa5,Jantunen Esa67,Sunela Kaisa5,Rajamäki Aino18,Alanne Erika9,Kuitunen Hanne3,Jukkola Arja5,Sancho Juan‐Manuel110ORCID,Kuittinen Outi1112,Rönkä Aino11

Affiliation:

1. University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences Medicine, School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine Kuopio Finland

2. Medical Department Trialing Health Barcelona Spain

3. Medical Research Centre and Cancer and Translational Research Unit University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital Oulu Finland

4. Department of Oncology Mikkeli Central Hospital Mikkeli Finland

5. Department of Oncology Tampere University Hospital, Tampere Cancer Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University Tampere Finland

6. Department of Medicine University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine/Internal Medicine, Hospital District of North Carelia, Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland

7. Department of Medicine Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland

8. Department of Oncology Hospital Nova of Central Finland Jyväskylä Finland

9. Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy Turku University Hospital, Western Finland Cancer Centre Turku Finland

10. Department of Hematology, ICO‐Badalona, IJC, UAB Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona Spain

11. Department of Oncology Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland

12. Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy Oulu University Hospital Oulu Finland

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere are few reports of clinical practice treatment patterns and efficacy in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively studied a large, multicenter, cohort of patients with MCL diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 in eight institutions.Results536 patients were registered (73% male, median of 70 years). Front‐line treatment was based on high‐dose cytarabine, bendamustine, and anthracyclines in 42%, 12%, and 15%, respectively. The median PFS for all patients was 45 months; 68, 34, and 30 months for those who received high‐dose cytarabine‐based, bendamustine‐based and anthracycline‐based therapy. 204 patients received second‐line. Bendamustine‐based treatment was the most common second‐line regimen (36% of patients). The median second‐line PFS (sPFS) for the entire cohort was 14 months; 19, 24, and 31 for bendamustine‐, platinum‐, and high‐dose cytarabine‐based regimens, with broad confidence intervals for these latter estimates. Patients treated with cytarabine‐based therapies in the front‐line and those with front‐line PFS longer than 24 months had a substantially superior sPFS.ConclusionFront‐line treatment in this cohort of MCL was as expected and with a median PFS of over 3.5 years. Second‐line treatment strategies were heterogeneous and the median second‐line PFS was little over 1 year.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3