Affiliation:
1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol 24 Tyndall Avenue Bristol BS8 1TQ UK
2. Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine University of Helsinki PL 21 (Haartmaninkatu 3) 00014 Helsinki Finland
Abstract
ABSTRACTForaging is risk sensitive if choices depend on the variability of returns from the options as well as their mean return. Risk‐sensitive foraging is important in behavioural ecology, psychology and neurophysiology. It has been explained both in terms of mechanisms and in terms of evolutionary advantage. We provide a critical review, evaluating both mechanistic and evolutionary accounts. Some derivations of risk sensitivity from mechanistic models based on psychophysics are not convincing because they depend on an inappropriate use of Jensen's inequality. Attempts have been made to link risk sensitivity to the ecology of a species, but again these are not convincing. The field of risk‐sensitive foraging has provided a focus for theoretical and empirical work and has yielded important insights, but we lack a simple and empirically defendable general account of it in either mechanistic or evolutionary terms. However, empirical analysis of choice sequences under theoretically motivated experimental designs and environmental settings appears a promising avenue for mapping the scope and relative merits of existing theories. Simply put, the devil is in the sequence.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology