A critical review of risk‐sensitive foraging

Author:

Houston Alasdair I.1ORCID,Rosenström Tom H.2

Affiliation:

1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol 24 Tyndall Avenue Bristol BS8 1TQ UK

2. Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine University of Helsinki PL 21 (Haartmaninkatu 3) 00014 Helsinki Finland

Abstract

ABSTRACTForaging is risk sensitive if choices depend on the variability of returns from the options as well as their mean return. Risk‐sensitive foraging is important in behavioural ecology, psychology and neurophysiology. It has been explained both in terms of mechanisms and in terms of evolutionary advantage. We provide a critical review, evaluating both mechanistic and evolutionary accounts. Some derivations of risk sensitivity from mechanistic models based on psychophysics are not convincing because they depend on an inappropriate use of Jensen's inequality. Attempts have been made to link risk sensitivity to the ecology of a species, but again these are not convincing. The field of risk‐sensitive foraging has provided a focus for theoretical and empirical work and has yielded important insights, but we lack a simple and empirically defendable general account of it in either mechanistic or evolutionary terms. However, empirical analysis of choice sequences under theoretically motivated experimental designs and environmental settings appears a promising avenue for mapping the scope and relative merits of existing theories. Simply put, the devil is in the sequence.

Funder

Academy of Finland

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference170 articles.

1. Suboptimal foraging behavior: a new perspective on gambling;Addicott M. A.;Behavioral Neuroscience,2015

2. Evolution and risky decisions;Barrett H. C.;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2000

3. Preferences for fixed and variable food sources: variability in amount and delay;Bateson M.;Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,1995

4. Starlings' preferences for predictable and unpredictable delays to food;Bateson M.;Animal Behaviour,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3