Clinical decision‐making process and distributive justice: The mediating role of economic analysis. Empirical evidence from Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe COVID‐19 pandemic has not only tested the resilience of public health systems but also underscored the criticality of allocative choices on health resources. These choices, however, are not confined to health emergencies but are integral to public health decisions, which inherently grapple with limited resources. In this context, physicians play a pivotal role as the architects of clinical actions in various scenarios. Therefore, doctors are called upon to make their decisions by considering not only the criteria of clinical appropriateness but also the ethical aspects linked, in particular, to the principle of justice. Indeed, the assessment of the effectiveness of a treatment for a particular patient must be balanced against criteria of equity and justice for the whole. To be fully applied, the principle of justice presupposes the use of economic evaluation techniques designed to drive the organisation decisions by effectiveness and efficiency.MethodsThe present paper aims to empirically analyse whether and to what extent economic evaluation is known and used by doctors in healthcare decision‐making and, therefore, what the most widespread approaches are used in such processes.In particular, this paper intends to present the results of an empirical study on a sample of doctors registered with the Order of Physicians in Lombardy (Italy), one of the areas most affected by the COVID‐19 pandemic.ResultsThe research reveals a particular awareness of the criticality of allocation issues accompanied by a lack of knowledge of the economic evaluation techniques or, more broadly, by an almost total disuse of financial criteria. The main reasons are doctors’ need for more knowledge of these tools and insufficient availability of economic information at the country system level.ConclusionIn the conclusion, we propose some suggestions to facilitate the transition to more current decision‐making models consistent with the characteristics of more advanced national healthcare contexts.