New directions for the Tea Bag Index: Alternative teabags and concepts can advance citizen science

Author:

Middelanis Thomas1ORCID,Pohl Chiara Marie1,Looschelders Dana1ORCID,Hamer Ute1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Landscape Ecology University of Münster Münster Germany

Abstract

AbstractSince its first publication in 2013, the Tea Bag Index (TBI) has attained widespread ecological application, generating scientific data on stabilization and turnover of organic matter in soils. As a result of manufacturing changes (net structure, net material, tea varieties) in the past years, a critical examination of alternative tea bag products is necessary. The present study for the first time generated decomposition data on a wide range of potential alternative tea brands (four brands tested) and varieties (rooibos [RB], green [GT], black [BT], and peppermint tea [PM]). They were tested in both a laboratory and a field experiment lasting 90 days. Under controlled laboratory conditions GT, BT, and PM corresponded well to the kinetic assumptions of an asymptote model of the TBI, but RB did not. In the field experiment, the tea mass remaining after 90 days was determined for all tea bags across different land uses (arable land, grassland, and forest). BT imitated the decomposition behavior of Lipton's original GT even better than any of the GT tested. The finer structure of Lipton's new tea bag nets did not negatively affect the precision of resultant remaining masses and thus can be recommended for future studies. In conclusion, alternative tea bags should be explored across brands as well as varieties. Based on our findings, we proposed an update of the TBI, which is based on the readily feasible modeling of the decomposition curve. Crucial is the combined consideration of both multiple tea varieties and incubation intervals of different durations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3