Abstract
Kant has famously argued that monogamous marriage is the only relationship where sexual use can take place “without degrading humanity and breaking the moral laws.” Kantian marriage, however, has been the target of fierce criticisms by contemporary thinkers: it has been regarded as flawed and paradoxical, as being deeply at odds with feminism, and, at best, as plainly uninteresting. In this paper, I argue that Kantian marriage can indeed survive these criticisms. Finally, the paper advances the discussion beyond marriage. Drawing on Kant's conception of friendship, I suggest that he might have overlooked the possibility of sex being morally permissible in yet another context.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Gender Studies
Reference15 articles.
1. Korsgaard, Christine. n.d. Integrity and interaction (lecture 6). Self constitution: Action, identity and integrity.http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~korsgaar/Korsgaard.LL6.pdf (accessed July 28, 2009).
2. Kant and The Marriage Right*
3. Witt, Charlotte . 1996. How feminism is re‐writing the philosophical canon. The Alfred P. Stiernotte Memorial Lecture in Philosophy at Quinnipiac College.http://www.uh.edu/~cfreelan/SWIP/Witt.html (accessed July 28, 2009).
4. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献