Abstract
It is standard in feminist commentaries to argue that Wollstonecraft's feminism is vitiated by her commitment to a liberal philosophical framework, relying on a valuation of reason over passion and on the notion of a sex-neutral self. I challenge this interpretation of Wollstonecraft's feminism and argue that her attempt to articulate an ideal of self-governance for women was an attempt to diagnose and resolve some of the tensions and inadequacies within traditional liberal thought.1
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Gender Studies
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Mary Astell's Female Retirement: Feminist Pedagogy and Politics in A Serious Proposal to the Ladies;Hypatia;2024-03-27
2. Mary Wollstonecraft;Elements on Women in;2022-09-27
3. Chronology;Mary Wollstonecraft in Context;2020-02-06
4. Preface;Mary Wollstonecraft in Context;2020-02-06
5. Translations;Mary Wollstonecraft in Context;2020-02-06