Evaluation of a community‐based brief intervention service for youth in crisis with suicidal ideation or self‐harm

Author:

Teasdale Scott B.12ORCID,Dixon Caitlin3,Ball Jeffrey S.3,Bradbury Natalie A.3,Gaskin Claire I. T.13,Curtis Jackie123,Mohan Adith345

Affiliation:

1. School of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health UNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia

2. Mindgardens Neuroscience Network Randwick New South Wales Australia

3. Mental Health Service South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Caringbah New South Wales Australia

4. School of Clinical Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Aging UNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia

5. Neuropsychiatric Institute Prince of Wales Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo evaluate the implementation of a mixed virtual and in‐person brief intervention for young people, aged 12–25 years, presenting to a large urban mental health service in crisis with suicidal ideation and/or self‐harm.MethodsA pragmatic, real‐world evaluation was conducted on the Youth Brief Intervention Service between June 2021 (inception) and October 2022. Service users were offered four sessions over an approximate one‐month period. Sessions focused on distress tolerance, safety plans and support systems. Implementation outcomes related to service uptake, retention, fidelity of the model and service user experience. Effectiveness outcomes were measured pre‐post and included mental health‐related hospital service utilization (primary outcome), functioning, mental health status, self‐harm, suicidal ideation and quality of life.ResultsOf the 136 young people referred to the Youth Brief Intervention Service, 99 were accepted with 17 disengaging before the first session. Eighty percent of people who commenced, completed the package of care. Young persons' and parent/carers experience of service was high (97% and 88%, respectively). Mental health‐related emergency department presentations and inpatient days decreased from 3 months pre‐intake to 3 months post‐intake (42 vs. 7 presentations, X2 = 25.3, p < .001; 11 vs. 0 inpatient days, X2 = 9.1, p = .01). There were significant improvements in mental health status, days engaging in self‐harm, general health and functioning and quality of life.ConclusionsThe Youth Brief Intervention Service is feasible, acceptable, subjectively beneficial and coincided with less mental health‐related emergency department presentations and inpatient days, and improved mental health status and behaviour.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference26 articles.

1. Interpreting scores on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10);Andrews G.;Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,2001

2. National study of mental health and wellbeing;Australian Bureau of Statistics;ABS,2022

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2023).Mental health services activity monitoring: Quarterly data.https://www.aihw.gov.au/mental-health/monitoring/mental-health-services-activity-monitoring

4. Performance of a five‐item mental health screening test;Berwick D. M.;Medical Care,1991

5. Brief interventions for self‐injurious thoughts and behaviors in young people: A systematic review;Dobias M. L.;Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3