Editorial: Changes in the field: banning p -values (or not), transparency, and the opportunities of a renewed discussion on rigorous (quantitative) research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Editorial: Changes in the field: banning p -values (or not), transparency, and the opportunities of a renewed discussion on rigorous (quantitative) research

Published:2018-04-18 Issue:2 Volume:23 Page:61-62
ISSN:1475-357X
Container-title:Child and Adolescent Mental Health
language:en
Short-container-title:Child Adolesc Ment Health

Author:

Spreckelsen Thees F.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Policy and Intervention; University of Oxford; Oxford UK

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/camh.12277/fullpdf

Reference8 articles.

1. BMC 2017 Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine https://jnrbm.biomedcentral.com

2. Many psychology papers fail replication test;Bohannon;Science,2015

3. Comments from the New Editor;Gill;Political Analysis,2018

4. Meta-research: Evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices;Ioannidis;PLoS Biology,2015

5. P values are just the tip of the iceberg;Leek;Nature,2015

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Editorial: Open science and methods review for Child and Adolescent Mental Health;Child and Adolescent Mental Health;2024-08-18

2. The interobserver reliability of clinical relevance in orthopaedic research;European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology;2022-08-03

3. The interobserver reliability of clinical relevance in medical research;Injury;2022-01

4. Standardizing statistics and data reporting in orthopaedic research;European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology;2021-01