Development and validation of the Dermatology Social Comparison (DSC) Scale

Author:

Choi Ellie12ORCID,Du Ruochen3,Yew Yik W.45,Long Valencia1,Oon Hazel H.4ORCID,Chandran Nisha S.12,Phan Phillip26ORCID,Chan Yiong H.3,Valderas Jose M.78

Affiliation:

1. Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine National University Healthcare System Singapore Singapore

2. Department of Medicine Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore

3. Biostatistics Unit Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore

4. Dermatology, National Skin Centre Singapore Singapore

5. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore

6. Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore USA

7. Centre for Research in Health System Performance Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore

8. Department of Family Medicine National University Healthcare System Singapore Singapore

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSocial comparison, the process of evaluating one's characteristics in relation to others, influences individuals' self‐perception and behavior. However, instruments are scarce for assessing social comparison in the medical setting.ObjectivesOur aim was to develop and validate a new scale for assessing social comparison.Materials and methodsSeven statements were developed, encompassing the perceived normality of having rashes, the tendency to compare their situation with others, and the emotional response when seeing someone better or worse off than themselves. The instrument was piloted in 15 patients for readability and face validity, then prospectively validated using modern psychometric methods in 1,053 adult patients with eczema or psoriasis from three tertiary dermatological centers in Singapore.ResultsOf 1,053 adult patients, 802 (76.2%) had eczema, and 251 (23.8%) had psoriasis. Exploratory factor analysis (using a 70% sample split) showed a single factor model comprising three questions (Eigenvalue: 1.4). Confirmatory factor analysis with the remaining 30% of the sample confirmed an excellent model fit. Cronbach's alpha was 0.7, and inter‐item correlations ranged from 0.42 to 0.46. In the Rasch analysis, item fit statistics and item characteristic curves showed appropriate discrimination between response options, although reliability was suboptimal with a person separation reliability of 0.63.ConclusionsComprising 3 questions, the newly derived social comparison scale showed acceptable psychometrics as a measure of social comparison for clinical and research purposes in dermatology. Its brief nature likely results from its brevity and applicability to conditions beyond eczema and psoriasis, which warrants further investigation.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference35 articles.

1. A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

2. Social comparisons and chronic illness: research synthesis and clinical implications;Arigo D;Health Psychol Rev,2012

3. Envy, Social Comparison, and Depression on Social Networking Sites: A Systematic Review

4. SOCIAL COMPARISON AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING: DOES THE HEALTH OF OTHERS MATTER?

5. A qualitative study of dermatology patients and providers to understand discordant perceptions of symptom burden and disease severity;Choi CEE;J Dermatolog Treat,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3