Translation and psychometrics of the Persian version of the Good Nursing Care Scale in Iran

Author:

Esmalizadeh Ahmad1,Heidarzadeh Mehdi1ORCID,Ramazanzadeh Nargess1,Karimollahi Mansoureh1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Ardabil University of Medical Sciences Ardabil Iran

Abstract

AbstractBackground and aimIdentifying and evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of nursing care provided to improve the quality of nursing care is increasingly emphasized, and it requires using valid tools in this field. This study aimed to translate and determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the “Good Nursing Care Scale” (GNCS‐P).MethodsThe present study is a methodological study in which the psychometric dimensions of GNCS‐P were studied from the perspective of 200 patients who were admitted to the hospitals of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. After translating the original version of the scale, its validity and reliability were evaluated and data analysis was performed using statistical package for social science (version 16) and analysis of moment structures (version 24).ResultsThe effect score of the item in the evaluation of face validity for each item was above 2.4. The content validity ratio for the scale was 0.88, and the content validity index tool was 0.86. The correlation of total instrument scores with the standard instrument was 0.839. According to the results of factor analysis, the values of factor loading of items were between 0.62 and 0.91, which were all significant. Therefore, the seven dimensions introduced in the main tool were approved. In addition, Cronbach's alpha results of 0.865 and correlation of 0.894 in the test–retest showed that the questionnaire has internal consistency and acceptable stability.ConclusionThe Persian version of the GNCS‐P has acceptable psychometric properties in the Iranian population and can be used as a valid tool in the areas of quality assessment of nursing care, education, and nursing research.Implications for Nursing PracticeThe results showed the validity and reliability of the tool and its usability as a valid tool in evaluating the quality of nursing care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Fundamentals and skills,Research and Theory

Reference32 articles.

1. Individual and district scale determinants of users’ satisfaction with primary health care in developing countries

2. Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio

3. Challenges of the execution of hospital accreditation in Iran: A critical review;Bahmaei J.;Community Based Research,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3