Social protection for mobile populations? A global perspective on immigrant social rights

Author:

Römer Friederike1ORCID,Henninger Jakob2ORCID,Harris Eloisa3

Affiliation:

1. German Centre for Integration and Migration Research (DeZIM) University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Centre 1342 “Global Dynamics of Social Policy” Bremen Germany

2. University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Centre 1342 “Global Dynamics of Social Policy” Bremen Germany

3. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity Göttingen Germany

Abstract

AbstractWhile a growing body of work investigates the social rights of immigrants, there is a notable lack of comparative research on the topic that includes countries in the Global South. In this paper we argue that existing approaches often lack reproducibility, comparability, and adaptability beyond the cases that they focus on. To remedy this shortcoming, we propose a three‐dimensional conceptualization of immigrant social rights that takes into account differences between legal categories of migrants, between types of welfare benefits, and between types of restrictions. Applying this conceptualization, we offer the Immigrant Social Rights Dataset (ImmigSR), a set of quantitative comparative measures of de jure immigrant social rights covering 39 countries in Europe, Latin America, North America, Oceania and Southeast Asia for the years 1980–2018. Our analyses show commonalities as well as differences between world regions. Rights are more inclusive in the Global North than in the Global South. There is however a slight trend towards convergence, with rights retrenchment in the North and expansions in the South. Across all regions, temporary migrant workers and asylum seekers are the groups that are granted the least comprehensive set of rights. Depending on the dimension that is taken into focus, there are however also more nuanced intra‐regional differences. The findings confirm the usefulness of a multi‐dimensional conceptual approach to measuring immigrant social rights in a diverse set of cases.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Development

Reference68 articles.

1. Social Security Regimes, Global Estimates, and Good Practices: The Status of Social Protection for International Migrants

2. Commentary: A Citizenship without Social Rights? EU Freedom of Movement and Changing Access to Welfare Rights

3. Conceptualizing and Measuring Immigration Policies: A Comparative Perspective

4. Bjerre L. Helbling M. Römer F. &Zobel M.(2016).The immigration policies in comparison (IMPIC) dataset: Technical report.WZB Discussion PapersNo. SP VI p. 201.http://hdl.handle.net/10419/145970

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3