Reconsidering the failure model: Using a genetically controlled design to assess the spread of problems from reactive aggression to internalizing symptoms through peer rejection across the primary school years
-
Published:2023-08-16
Issue:1
Volume:95
Page:261-275
-
ISSN:0009-3920
-
Container-title:Child Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Child Development
Author:
Faur Sharon1ORCID,
Valdes Olivia1ORCID,
Vitaro Frank2,
Brendgen Mara3ORCID,
Boivin Michel4,
Laursen Brett1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Florida Atlantic University Fort Lauderdale Florida USA
2. University of Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada
3. University of Quebec at Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada
4. Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada
Abstract
AbstractAccording to the failure model (Patterson & Capaldi, 1990), peer rejection is the intermediary link between problem behaviors and internalizing symptoms. The present study tested the model with 464 monozygotic and same‐sex dizygotic twin pairs (234 female, 230 male dyads). Teacher‐reported reactive aggression and internalizing symptoms, and peer‐reported peer rejection were collected at ages 6, 7, and 10 (from 2001 to 2008). Support for the failure model emerged in conventional non‐genetically controlled analyses, but not twin‐difference score analyses (which remove shared environmental and genetic contributions). Univariate biometric models attributed minimal variance in failure model variables to shared environmental factors, suggesting that genetic factors play an important unacknowledged role in developmental pathways historically ascribed to nonshared experiences in the failure model.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health